 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
LIFESTYLE & CELEBRITIES
DIVAS! DIVAS! WHAT ELSE!?
Nigel Huntington, Staff Writer
Super duper American
entertainment star, Peggy Judy with Stella Stevens outside a
glamorous West Hollywood nightclub after a soldout show! Ms Judy's
photo made the front cover of the recently published book
Showbiz, Pioneers, Best Singers, Musicians and Entertainers from
1606 to the Present, an official publication of FAMSPA,
written by Mr Maximillien de Lafayette and published by Times Square
Press.
Ms Peggy Judy in all her glitzy folie extravaganza on the cover of
volume IV of the WORLD WHO'S WHO IN JAZZ, CABARET, MUSIC AND
ENTERTAINMENT. Insiders told the International Herald Daily News,
Ms Judy was chosen because she is the perfect blend of the
vanished era of Vaudeville and the contemporary American showbiz.
LONDON- So just when I thought
this was it, the series is finished, a so-called friend and
colleague shoved the newly published Volume IV of the World Who’s
Who in Jazz, Cabaret, Music and Entertainment on my desk. “Read,”
he said. “Review. It’s your kind of stuff, Nigel.” Just as I was
going to grumble that I was too busy (one has to maintain one’s
reputation) my eyes landed on the cover, and there was Miss Peggy
Judy, the great singer, published author, and possessor of the
best legs in the industry. There she sits, silhouetted against the
rich black cover in her Toulouse Lautrec dress. So naturally I
picked up the book for a closer look. After studying the artistic
design for a while, I flipped the book over. On the back cover,
Maximillien de Lafayette, the international authority on
entertainment and performing arts, the
linguist, artist, and all around Renaissance man, smiles in a
rather smug way, surrounded by the pictures of seven divas. You
can learn something from this chap, I always say; how does he get
them to flock around him? So okay, I was hooked, and I opened the
book.
Seven
international divas appeared on the cover of Showbiz, Pioneers,
Best Singers, Musicians and Entertainers from 1606 to the Present.
First row from L to R: Antoinette Montague, Maria Gentile, Zola,
Irene Soderberg. Second row, from L to R: Stephanie Jordan,
Nichaud Fitzgibbon, Katie Bull. Seven Divas or seven graces,
slogan or semantics...it does not matter, it leads to one
destination "They are the 4 winds and 4 aromas of world
entertainment": said Carol Lexter, editor at the World Who's Who.
The wealth of information in
this learned tome is outstanding. Not only all the necessary lists
of people, places, venues, best of the best, legends, new talents,
new albums, etc., but an extended, scholarly history of the
industry as well. I had to spend some time reading about the early
days of the cabaret, African-American music, gospel music, and
more, skipping back and forth to enjoy stories about individuals
whom I have always found interesting, from various countries and
genres. There are hundreds of pictures there, most beautiful and
enjoyable, accompanying well-researched, meticulous text. As
always, de Lafayette includes new talents among the great legends,
which in my humble view keep things fresh and exciting.
I highly recommend
this book, both on its own and as a part of the intriguing, unique
series of the Who’s Who. There is nothing like it out there, trust
me, I know books. All I ask is to have some time between volumes –
they come fast and furious, and honestly I want to be able to
devote some time to reading them!
_____________________________________________________
IS BRITAIN LOOSING ITS JOIE DE VIVRE?
Britain is less
happy than in the 1950s - despite the fact that we are three times
richer. The proportion of people saying they are "very happy"
has fallen from 52% in 1957 to just 36% today.

Happiness levels were
higher in post-war Britain.
The opinion poll by GfK NOP for The Happiness
Formula series provides the first evidence that Britain's happiness
levels are declining - a trend already well documented in the United
States. Polling data from Gallup throughout the 1950s shows
happiness levels above what they are today, suggesting that our
extra wealth has not brought extra well-being. It could even be
making matters worse. The British experience mirrors data from
America, where social scientists have seen levels of life
satisfaction gradually decline over the last quarter of a century.
In the early 1970s, 34% of those interviewed in the General Social
Survey described themselves as "very happy". By the late 1990s, the
figure was 30% - a small but statistically significant drop. The
story of wealth failing to translate into extra happiness is the
story of the Western world. In almost every developed country,
happiness levels have remained largely static over the past 50 years
- despite huge increases in income. What the happiness research
suggests is that once average incomes reach about £10,000 a year,
extra money does not make a country any happier.
How does Britain compare?
Our poll asked people how satisfied they were
with their lives as a whole using a one to 10 scale. The mean score
was 7.3 which puts the UK some way down the world rankings. One
recent table has Switzerland as the happiest country, followed by
Denmark, Sweden, Ireland and the USA. Britain comes eighth. Many
different organisations, including the United Nations, have
attempted to compare the happiness rates of different countries.
Should politicians try to make us happier? In our opinion poll we
asked whether the government's prime objective should be the
"greatest happiness" or the "greatest wealth". A remarkable 81%
wanted happiness as the goal. Only 13% wanted greatest wealth.
Should schoolchildren be taught how to be happy? GfK NOP asked
people whether they thought schools should put more emphasis on
teaching students how to achieve a happy personal life and less on
educating them for the world of work. A majority - 52% agreed that
more emphasis should be placed on happiness - 43% disagreed.
Less friendly?
Our poll asked whether people felt their
neighbourhood was more or less friendly now than it was 10 years
ago. 43% said less friendly, compared to 22% of people who said it
was friendlier. So what makes us happy? Almost half of people - 48%
- say that relationships are the biggest factor in making them
happy. Second is health on 24%. When we asked people to choose the
two most important sources of happiness in their lives, out of 1001
people only 77 people said work fulfilment. According to the science
of happiness, friends are crucial to our well-being. Yet according
to our opinion poll, most of us speak to only a small number of
close friends every week. Six out of 10 people spoke to five friends
or fewer each week. Two out of 10 spoke to only one or two friends.
And one person in 25 talked to no friends at all.
Contentment
We also asked people to say, in their own words,
what happiness meant to them. According to analysis by Ilona
Boniwell, a psychologist at Oxford Brookes University, most people's
definition involved family and friends. But the results threw up a
surprise. The second largest group of responses centred around
contentment and inner peace. It does appear that many people's
happiness is about escaping the stress and pace of modern life. It
has been suggested that rising levels of stress and depression may
indicate that Britain is becoming more unhappy. However, it is not
clear whether clinical diagnoses reflect a real fall in happiness or
a greater willingness to seek help for psychological problems.
Research throughout the world suggests that most people are slightly
to moderately happy, and only a few people say they are unhappy. The
Happiness Formula poll found that 92% of people described themselves
as either fairly happy or very happy. Only 8% said they were fairly
unhappy or very unhappy. Professor Ed Diener, a leading psychologist
based at the University of Illinois, said: "The idea that modern
society is a sink of unhappiness seems wrong". However, average
happiness scores do appear to be static or falling.
Happy together
Nearly half of married people told us they are
"very happy". Only a quarter of singles said the same. Researchers
believe the key factor is the promise to stay together. Is happiness
linked to health? GfK NOP asked people how they would describe their
state of health. Among those who described themselves as "very
happy", 45% said they had "very good" health. Among those only
"fairly happy" 23% said they had "very good" health. Our opinion
poll asked whether people would take a legally available drug that
made them happy if there were no side-effects. Nearly three out of
four, 72%, of people said no and 26% said yes. -Mark Eatlon.
Madonna's giant cross 'offensive'

Madonna's Confessions
tour is expected to make $190m (£101m).
The Church of England has criticised Madonna's
appearance on a cross to kick off her latest tour in Los Angeles.
Why would someone with so much talent seem to feel the need to
promote herself by offending so many people?" said the church in a
statement. Madonna performed the ballad Live To Tell while suspended
from a giant mirrored cross on the opening night. David Muir of the
Evangelical Alliance also accused the singer of "blatant
insensitivity".
"Madonna's use of Christian imagery is an abuse and it
is dangerous," he said. "She should drop it from the tour and people
need to find their own means of expressing their disapproval."
Madonna's spokesperson was not available for comment at the time of
publication. This is not the first time the pop star's concerts have
upset the Church. In 1990, the Pope called for a boycott of the
Blond Ambition tour, in which Madonna simulated masturbation during
Like A Virgin. The video for Like A Prayer also brought condemnation
from the Vatican for its burning crosses and depiction of a black
Jesus. The 51-date Confessions world tour kicked off in Los Angeles
on Sunday. It will reach Britain in July.
Paris unveils tribal art museum
French President Jacques Chirac has unveiled
his legacy to the nation - a 260m euro (£180m) riverside museum in
the shadow of Paris' Eiffel Tower. The museum displays
indigenous art from Africa, Asia and Australasia. But the project
has been controversial. It opens as France debates how to heal the
scars of its colonial past and accept a multi-ethnic nation. UN
Secretary General Kofi Annan was among the guests at the
inauguration of the Musee du Quai Branly.
Guatemalan Nobel Peace Prize winner Rigoberta Menchu,
the premier of the Canadian territory of Nunavut, Paul Okalik, and
French Prime Minister Dominique de Villepin also attended the
opening. The museum officially opens to the public on 23 June. The
museum, on the banks of the River Seine, has been a decade in the
making. The artefacts going on display range from masks and spears
from Papua New Guinea to costumes from Vietnam and Thailand.
The
museum brings continents and cultures together, contributors
say
|
The building combines angular glass walls with
futuristic cubes of bright colour and, outside, a green wall of
thick vegetation, suggestive of a forest or a jungle. The museum was
designed by French architect Jean Nouvel, and is meant to be
President Chirac's legacy after nearly 12 years in office.Its
curators say the museum is a celebration of cultural diversity, a
way of showing how Europe has interacted with other civilisations.
Most museums normally chart their countries' history - they do not
usually look at other countries' history, says museum president
Stephane Martin. "It is the first time that a great country gives
itself a great institution not to speak about itself, but not to
hide the history of its relationship to others," he told French
radio. Critics say the museum does not do enough to explain to
visitors the damage done by colonialism to many of those cultures.
Most of the 300,000 artefacts were brought to France from its former
colonies. Some historians and human rights groups say the display
perpetuates the old colonialist view of Africa or Asian culture as
more primitive than European civilisation. However, the aboriginal
artists who contributed their works to the museum disagree. They say
they see President Chirac's project as a good way to bring
continents and cultures together.
|
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|