Back ] Home ] Next ]

MYSTERIES

Mysteries, Magic and Powers of Art

The Secret Healing Powers of Images and Icons

Photo: Talisman of Cyprian, Syrian priest, to free the virgin Justine." Protective scroll, nineteenth century, parchment, 24 x 17.6 cm. Private collection. Photo courtesy of Guy Vivien.

The theme of the divine face surrounded by cherubim appears fairly often in clerics' explanations of the talismans, especially in cases of a central face framed by four eyes or four faces. (Doesn't a prayer say that "the vision of his Face and the hearing of his Names" undoes spells?) God is represented in Ethiopian spiritual painting, then, as surrounded by four bearers, who have the faces of a lion, a man, a bull, and an eagle, all "full of eyes." The interpretation of the eyes as the eyes of the cherubim is thus doubly justified. The recitation of the invocation puts vision and speech not in an illustrational relationship but in parallel: both compete for the cure. No talisman has a canonical interpretation. In the eight-pointed star, the cleric in Shire might see a "face of man;" others see the seal of Solomon, or the Cross, a face in light, or a symbol of the four directions of the compass.

Photo,  right: This talisman wards off spirits that make business enterprises go bad. Solomon's seal by Gera, 1947, ball-point pen and marker on paper, 20.5 x 16 cm. Collection: Musee National des Arts d'Afrique et d'Oceanie, Paris. Gift of Jacques Mercier. Photo courtesy of Guy Vivien

 A number of clerics would offer no interpretation at all. When a cleric gives a colleague a talisman, he indicates its application, the prayer associated with it, its method of use, the master from whom he obtained it, and his own experience with it--that is, how many people he has cured with it. The talisman's name and its symbolism are not indispensable. Asked about the meaning of a talisman, a skillful cleric can recount it while reading prayers. Professors of poetry (qene) are best at this game, for they have at their disposal an immense base of oral traditions in which the symbols are no less important than the character themselves.

Christianity, Possession, and Talismanic Art

Integrated into the cult of a zar, the scroll tends to become a sacrificial medium. While it is used according to Christian orthodoxy, it loses its material and almost all reference to the particular situation of the patient. Between the extremes of moist and dry, blood and dust, the depths of the body and the heights of the soul, the Ethiopian scholars have developed the most original part of their talismanic arts. They have done this in relation to situations where one must register an invasion of the body, must chase the intruders out, seal the body up, and forbid them access to it: "The house that is the body will no longer have either door or window by which the demon may enter," as Asres used to say. While differing elsewhere, Christian discourse and the discourse of the zar are mutually reinforcing on the question of possession. If Christianity is a religion of transcendence, it still allows spirits, and even the holiest of these, may dwell in a human body. Talismanic art, which has always flirted with possession, has found an extraordinary catalyst of this potential in the Ethiopian universe. And if this potential is really implicit in Christian visual art, we can legitimately ask if Christianity has not been able to engender a talismanic art in its purest form, that is, in asceticism. This is suggested by the association of the seals with the image of abba Melki driving a demon before him. It is as if, the better to fight the violent and insidious assaults of demons, the athletes of God needed to exercise their inflexible will through images more powerful than simple commemorative portraits. In the West, possession and ecstasy found a privileged expression in Baroque sculpture. Did the churches of the East do something similar in talismanic art? Talismans and representational images go together on most scrolls. The routine practice of including images believed effective may explain this combination, which appeared in the scrolls' historical sources--the Hermetists set their charakteres alongside figurative images. But resistance to the standardization of this system cannot have been lacking. Gedewon's explanations of the "sign of the cross," and the traditional stories of the origins of these two types of painting, allow us to see causes beyond the scribes' routine.

MORE NEXT

 

Back ] Home ] Next ]