Back ] Home ] Next ]

POLITICAL COMMENTARIES                                                                                                                   By MAXIMILLIEN DE LAFAYETTE 

 

 

 

 And I call on you today, my good friends from Gush Emunim, to perform your tasks with no less modesty than your predecessors, on other days and nights. We do not require anyone to supervise the Kashrut of our commitment to the Land of Israel! We have dedicated our lives to the land of Israel and to the struggle for its liberation, and will continue to do so.” I call on the people of Israel to unite at this decisive hour.  We must find a common denominator for some form of “necessary unity” which will enable us to cope with these fateful days with understanding, and through our common destiny, and which will allow us to construct a dam against brotherly hatred which pushes many over the edge.  We have already paid an unbearably high price for murderous fanaticism.  We must find the root which brings us all together, and must carry out our actions with the wisdom and responsibility which allow us to lead our lives here as a mature and experienced nation.  I call on you to support me at this decisive time.

Yasser Arafat chose the latter – the path of blood, fire and shaheeds. 

 I have been told that the disengagement will be interpreted as a shameful withdrawal under pressure, and will increase the terror campaign, present Israel as weak, and will show our people as a nation unwilling to fight and to stand up for itself.  I reject that statement outright.  We have the strength to defend this country, and to strike at the enemy which seeks to destroy us. And there are those who tell me that, in exchange for a genuine signed peace agreement, they too would be willing to make these painful compromises.  However, regrettably, we do not have a partner on the other side with whom to conduct genuine dialogue, in order to achieve a peace agreement.  Even prime ministers of Israel who declared their willingness to relinquish the maximum territory of our homeland were answered with fire and hostility.  Recently, the chairman of the Palestinian Authority declared that “a million shaheeds will break through to Jerusalem”.  In the choice between a responsible and wise action in history, which may lead to painful compromise and a “holy war” to destroy Israel, Yasser Arafat chose the latter – the path of blood, fire and shaheeds.  He seeks to turn a national conflict which can be terminated through mutual understanding into a religious war between Islam and Jews, and even to spill the blood of Jews who live far away. Israel has many hopes, and faces extreme dangers.  The most prominent danger is Iran, which is making every effort to acquire nuclear weapons and ballistic missiles, and establishing an enormous terror network together with Syria in Lebanon. And I ask you: what are we doing and what are we struggling over in the face of these terrible dangers?  Are we not capable of uniting to meet this threat?  This is the true question. The Disengagement Plan does not replace negotiations and is not meant to permanently freeze the situation which will be created.  It is an essential and necessary step in a situation which currently does not enable genuine negotiations for peace.  However, everything remains open for a future agreement, which will hopefully be achieved when this murderous terror ends, and our neighbors will realize that they cannot triumph over us in this land. Mr. Chairman, with your permission, I will read several lines from a famous essay which was published in the midst of the Arab Revolt of 1936 – and we must bear in mind that the Jewish community in Israel numbered less than 400,000. 

 

 

 

We have no desire to permanently rule over millions of Palestinians

 This essay by Moshe Beilinson was published in “Davar”, as I mentioned, during the murderous Arab Revolt of 1936 (and I quote): “How much longer?  People ask.  How much longer?  Until the strength of Israel in its land will condemn and defeat in advance any enemy attack; until the most enthusiastic and bold in any enemy camp will know; there are no means to break the strength of Israel in its land, because the necessity of life is with it, and the truth of life is with it, and there is no other way but to accept it.  This is the essence of this campaign.” I am convinced that everything we have done since then confirms these emphatic words. We have no desire to permanently rule over millions of Palestinians, who double their numbers every generation.  Israel, which wishes to be an exemplary democracy, will not be able to bear such a reality over time.  The Disengagement Plan presents the possibility of opening a gate to a different reality. Today, I wish to address our Arab neighbors.  Already in our Declaration of Independence, in the midst of a cruel war, Israel, which was born in blood, extended its hand in peace to those who fought against it and sought to destroy it by force (and I quote): “We appeal – in the very midst of the onslaught launched against us now for months – to the Arab inhabitants of the State of Israel to preserve peace and participate in the upbuilding of the State on the basis of full and equal citizenship and due representation in all its provisional and permanent institutions.” Thank you.
 

ARABS AND PALESTINIAN AUTHORITIES REMAIN SKEPTICAL

Raji Sourani: Sharon is just deceiving the world. He's not putting an end to the occupation. He's just deploying his troops in a different way

Although  Palestinians welcome the Israeli withdrawal, a considerable number of political leaders and Arab activists in the west remain skeptical. And Mr. Raji Sourani, an important Palestinian figure who is heading the Palestinian Center for Human Rights is waging a campaign of distrust for all the efforts of the Israeli Prime Minister. However, the majority of the Palestinian population in Gaza are rejoicing the Israeli withdrawal. Mosques in Gaza and Syria are welcoming the Israeli move. Aran cars and trucks horns blare loud in the Palestinian streets. Yet, incomprehensibly, many Palestinians in  Market Street,  say that they do not believe the Israelis will really leave, despite the fact that  the Knesset votes on Monday on Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon's disengagement plan. It is typical Arab and typical Palestinian.

The withdrawal will give away  approximately   8,000  Israeli homes.

"The Israelis don't mean  what they say," said Khalil Mahfouz, a shopkeeper in Gaza.  Selim Tabbah, a teacher in the Gaza trip is telling his students: "If the Israelis want to withdraw, that is fine, but  we know very well, the Israelis  don't stick to their word."  Tabbah, even protested in the Market and summed up the mood on Market Street. Many protesters joined him at the market, including those who live and work in Jerusalem. Palestinians  find it hard to believe that Israel may really be about to step back. "We never trust Ariel Sharon. Never. He's bitten us one thousand  times. He plays games with us. There is no way in the world we can trust the Zionist" said a 65-year-old Ahmad Bashiri a butcher in Gaza. The withdrawal will give away  approximately   8,000  Israeli homes. The press in Great Britain seems to side with the Palestinians in their concerns about effective global Israeli withdrawal. They claim that the space is badly needed by the 1.3 million Palestinians who are crammed into the rest of Gaza - making it one of the most crowded places in the world.

The Israeli occupation will continue.

Palestinians are demanding that the total Israeli forces of occupation should leave all the Palestinian lands  and evacuate their watchtowers and  checkpoints that cut the strip in two at Abu Houilly.

 

Back ] Home ] Next ]